Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Blogs Forums Photos Calendar ABCActionNews.com

Flashpoint

Phony outrage on the campaign trail

"I was utterly shocked," -Sen. John Warner, R-Virginia

"Beyond comprehension " -Former Sen. Bob Dole, R-Kansas

"A very indecent thing," -Retired Air Force Col. Bud Day

"The horror!"- ABC Action News Anchor, Brendan McLaughlin

No, it wasn't the explosion of the Hindenburg or the Holocaust that inspired such dudgeon. It was this bland observation by General Wesley Clark about John McCain on a Sunday morning news show,

 "I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president."

 

The statement is so obviously true, that it barely merits discussion. Instead, it has McCain supporters wondering aloud what kind of animal would even think such a thing?  Does Wesley Clark eat with that mouth? Does he kiss his wife with that mouth?  Meanwhile, Barack Obama is chiseling a granite monument to McCain with his own bare hands to assure voters that he indeed honors his fellow Senator's service.

 

 The cable channels are quick to characterize General Clark's comments as a denigration of McCain's military service. You want to hear the denigration of a military record?  Peruse the Swift Boaters description of John Kerry's service. Or read about the Senate race between Saxby Chambliss and former incumbent, Max Cleland who left behind both legs and one arm in Vietnam.

 

The assertion that military service of any kind does not, in itself, pre-qualify someone for the myriad responsibilities of the presidency is no more offensive than pointing out that Obama's brief tour of duty in the Senate fails to do the same.  The outrage is phony and watching Barack Obama try to put out flames of an imaginary fire is not pretty.  Making John McCain's war record a taboo subject is counter to the democratic ideals he went to war to defend in the first place.  

-----------------------

 

Speaking of Vietnam...

 

This is a donation bowl set up at the Hanoi airport I encountered during my visit earlier this month.   Have your kids gotten any of this money?

Attachment: DSCN0342 resized.JPG (208793 bytes)

 

 

Published Monday, June 30, 2008 4:05 PM by Brendan
Attachment(s): DSCN0342 resized.JPG

Comments

 

K-Rog said:

Pow! Great points, Brendan. The real puppet show is on now. If there is a real Barack I don't expect to see him until November 10th. Will it be too late?
June 30, 2008 10:00 PM
 

thomas said:

Well put, I felt the same watching all the hyped up indignation.  The best one was on our local Fox station, where a supposed Fox executive (it was pointed out he was a Democrat) said "Wesley Clark should just shut up".  Oh the humanity!
Clark's taking the bullet for Obama on this one and only a General can pull that of.  Democrats know they have to chip on that perceived security issue.  Republicans want to keep McCain's service a sacred cow.  We'll see.
July 1, 2008 6:38 AM
 

K-Rog said:

RE: donation bowl... shouldn't the money for "difficult children" go to the parents? Ya know, Xanex and such.
July 1, 2008 7:50 PM
 

Emilie said:

Brendan,
I respectfully disagree but you are wrong. Don't make a superficial comparison of comments between those who served on Swift Boats and a General.  And don't make a comparison between Sen Kerry and Sen McCain. The contempt Gen Clark showed for the naval career of Sen McCain is truly outrageous.  What about the almost 6 yrs as a POW during which McCain showed leadership and patriotism over and over to inspire the other POWs with him?  And if that is the low opinion Clark has of a naval hero, what is his real opinion of Obama who didn't serve in the military at all?
July 6, 2008 10:43 AM
 

Richard Russell said:

The True Story of Max Cleland's Vietnam Injuries ( blew himself up- does this qualify  for hero status by the butt-suck Wes the weasel Clark?)

A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY
by Christopher Crallé

I wrote last night in response to the column by Ann Coulter. My father, who has close personal ties with Max, has responded to me and I forward his reply.

What follows is the true account of Max Cleland's injury in Vietnam.

---------

Thank you Chris. I did not have the links to this, but Max called me about it in case I needed to tell the real truth should someone want to know. This Ann Coulter has written real slime. Only in America. Our service men and women fight and die to defend your right to a free press. The press needs to be aware of their responsibility to use this democratic tool in a responsibility way.

------------------------------

The 2nd of the 12th Cavalry was engaged in a combat operation at the time of this incident. Max Cleland was with the Battalion Forward Command Post in heavy combat involving the attack of the 1st Cavalry Division up the valley to relieve the Marines who were besieged and surrounded at the Khe Shan Firebase. The whole surrounding area was an active combat zone (some might call the entire country of Vietnam a combat zone). (Is Iraq a combat zone?) Max, the Battalion Signal Officer, was engaged in a combat mission I personally ordered to increase the effectiveness of communications between the battalion combat forward and rear support elements: e.g. Erect a radio relay antenna on a mountain top. By the way, at one point the battalion rear elements came under enemy artillery fire so everyone was in harms way.

As they were getting off the helicopter, Max saw the grenade on the ground and he instinctively went for it. Soldiers in combat don't leave grenades lying around on the ground. Later, in the hospital, he said he thought it was his own but I doubt the concept of "ownership" went through his mind in the split seconds involved in reaching for the grenade. Nearly two decades later another soldier came forward and admitted it was actually his grenade. Does ownership of the grenade really matter? It does not.

Maury Cralle'
Battalion Executive Officer
2d/12th Cavalry Battalion
1st Air Cavalry Division
During the assault on Khe Shan
July 6, 2008 11:26 AM
 

Richard Russell said:

"I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president."


Please supply  a qualification to be president exhibited by Barak Hussein Abamma? He's an empty suit reading a tele-prompter

July 6, 2008 11:37 AM
 

thomas said:

Emilie
When you "respectfully disagree" that usually means you think the other person "is wrong".   These "superficial comparisons" are dripping with irony, don't you see?   Senator John Kerry, a two time Vietnam vet, was demonized by the right to favor a draft dodging chickenhawk like Dubya.  It was Dubya who went after McCain's service in 2000 to defeat him.   Was this "truly outrageous" as well?   Bet you voted for Bush.  You're getting the irony in all of this right?  Irony is defined by comparisons.   If you don't like a comparison then debunk it, you can't simply say it shouldn't be done... just because you don't like it.  
July 13, 2008 1:48 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled

This Blog

Post Calendar

<June 2008>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Syndication

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems
Inergize Digital Media This site powered by Inergize Digital Media. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of this station.